Legal Opinion

Cieslinski v. Clark

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 20, 1949No. 27718PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[1] Action for unlawful detainer. Plaintiffs are the owners of an apartment building consisting of six three-room apartments and one two-room apartment. Since sometime in December, 1947, defendant has occupied one of the three-room apartments as a tenant of plaintiffs, and has paid a rental of $8 per week. The rent was paid each Saturday. There was no rental contract in writing. Plaintiffs and their son, Edward Cieslinski, occupied a three-room apartment adjoining that occupied by defendant.

[2] On June 24, 1948, plaintiffs served defendant with a written notice to vacate the apartment he…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Cluck v. AbeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1931
  2. Wiener v. Mutual Life Insurance Co. of New YorkSupreme Court of Missouri · 1944
  3. Connole v. East St. Louis & Suburban Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1937
  4. State Ex Rel. Strohfeld v. CoxSupreme Court of Missouri · 1930
  5. Cantley v. PlattnerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1934

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Esmar v. Zurich Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1972
  2. Gaffner v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Missouri · 1960
  3. Jackson v. EngertMissouri Court of Appeals · 1970
  4. Bartlett v. GraffenreidMissouri Court of Appeals · 1957
  5. J. R. Watkins Co. v. SmithMissouri Court of Appeals · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API