Legal Opinion

Connole v. East St. Louis & Suburban Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided March 11, 1937PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Martha Connole, administratrix of the estate of Louis Di Carlo, deceased, instituted suit against the East St. Louis Suburban Railway Company, a corporation, for $10,000 damages, for the benefit of the widow and two dependent minor children of said Di Carlo [Smith-Hurd R.S. Ill., 1929, Chap. 70, Secs. 1, 2], arising out of the death of said Di Carlo in a collision at a highway-interurban grade intersection in the State of Illinois between an automobile truck and trailer operated by Di Carlo and a car of said railway. The jury found for defendant. Judgment accordingly and plaintiff appeals.

Plai…

2Cases cited65 opinions

  1. Pokora v. Wabash Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Cluck v. AbeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1931
  3. Illinois Central R. R. Co. v. OswaldIllinois Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Bernier v. Illinois Central RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Walldren Express & Van Co. v. KrugIllinois Supreme Court · 1920

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Lewis Ex Rel. Piening v. ZagataSupreme Court of Missouri · 1942
  2. West v. St. Louis Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1951
  3. Hodge v. BordenIdaho Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Giles v. Moundridge Milling Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1943
  5. Redick v. M. B. Thomas Auto Sales, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1954

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API