Legal Opinion

Wiener v. Mutual Life Insurance Co. of New York

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided March 6, 1944No. 38674PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.

This is an action by Dr. Wiener.to recover disability benefits under an insurance policy. The jury found for the insurance company. The judges of the St. Louis Court of Appeals were divided, so the case was transferred to this Court. 170 S. W. (2d) 174. We hear the case anew:

Dr. Wiener vras an active medical practitioner for forty years and had become a recognized leader in his specialty, diseases of the eye. He had a large office practice where he examined, diagnosed, treated and advised patients. He had a large surgical practice. He regularly operated three afternoons a week besides…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Cluck v. AbeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1931
  2. Erreca v. Western States Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Rezendes v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  4. Heald v. Aetna Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1937
  5. Prudential Insurance v. BrookmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1934

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Rice v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1949
  2. Hungate v. HudsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1945
  3. Holmes v. Terminal RR Ass'n of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1953
  4. Venditti v. St. Louis Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1950
  5. Frisella v. Reserve Life Insurance Co. of DallasMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API