Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of De Coster

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided March 20, 1934PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wingate, S.

The present application for probate of an alleged codicil presents certain unusual features.

On May 14, 1930, testatrix executed a will in which, inter alia, she divided her residuary estate among three of her children, giving one-fourth thereof to her son Robert, one-fourth to her daughter Grace, and one-half to her daughter Eva. All three were living at the time of her death, which occurred on May 6, 1932, and were duly cited in a proceeding to probate the will. The will being duly proved, it was admitted on June 17, 1932.

This petition for probate recited in usual language that…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. In Re the Estate of GreenbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
  2. In Re the Probate of the Will of StaigerNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
  3. In re the Estate of McCaffertyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1932
  4. In re the Estate of GreenbergNew York Surrogate's Court · 1931
  5. In re the Estate of WebbNew York Surrogate's Court · 1923

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of AndriolaNew York Surrogate's Court · 1936
  2. In re the Estate of Ten EyckNew York Surrogate's Court · 1935
  3. In re the Estate of StricklandNew York Surrogate's Court · 1939
  4. In re the Estate of LakeNew York Surrogate's Court · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API