Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Hartfield

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided February 10, 1931PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wingate, S.

The question of testamentary construction here raised concerns certain portions of the residuary directions of the will of this decedent, which was admitted to probate on July 17, 1925.

By the “ twenty-third ” item of the will the testator devised and bequeathed the entire rest, residue and remainder of his property to his executors in trust, directing them in subparagraph 'j_b ” *216to pay an annual income of $5,000 to Norman Pendlebury until he attained the age of thirty-five years, at which time one-fourth of the principal of the residuary estate was to be paid over to him. Certain…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cochrane v. . SchellNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  2. Beekman v. . BonsorNew York Court of Appeals · 1861
  3. Matter of KohlerNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
  4. In Re the Accounting of HarteauNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
  5. Stephens v. Van BurenNew York Court of Chancery · 1829

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of McCaffertyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1932
  2. In re the Estate of ShupackNew York Surrogate's Court · 1936
  3. In re the Estate of HopnerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1933
  4. In re the Estate of BurroughsNew York Surrogate's Court · 1935
  5. In re the Estate of MooresNew York Surrogate's Court · 1935

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API