Legal Opinion
Ward v. New York
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided August 19, 2003No. 1:03-cv-00485PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
SKRETNY, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
One of federalism’s fundamental principles is that the States are primarily responsible for protecting the health, safety, and welfare of their citizens. As such, the State of New York has a legitimate and substantial interest in enacting laws and regulations pursuant to its historic police power. On the other hand, Indian tribes have a unique sovereign status, recognized by the Supreme Court and deeply rooted in traditions of tribal independence, which insulates them from state regulation in some respects. This case involves a…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Gibbons v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Babbitt v. United Farm Workers National UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Morales v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- New Hampshire Motor Transport Ass'n v. RoweCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
- State Ex Rel. Edmondson v. Native Wholesale SupplySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2010
- People ex rel. Harris v. Black Hawk Tobacco, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2011
- New York v. United Parcel Service, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2017
- State Ex Rel. Suthers v. Cash Advance & Preferred Cash LoansColorado Court of Appeals · 2008
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.