Legal Opinion
People ex rel. Harris v. Black Hawk Tobacco, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 13, 2011No. E051027PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CODRINGTON, J.
I
INTRODUCTION
The superior court granted a preliminary injunction prohibiting defendants and appellants Black Hawk Tobacco, Inc. (Black Hawk), and Frederick Allen McAllister (McAllister) from selling cigarettes to non-Indians in violation of state and federal laws. Black Hawk and McAllister appeal from the order granting the injunction. (Code Civ. Proc., § 904.1, subd. (a)(6).)
On appeal, defendants argue that the State of California cannot regulate defendants’ sale of cigarettes to non-Indians because defendants are operating stores located on trust lands held by the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Cel-Tech Communications, Inc. v. Los Angeles Cellular Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
- Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Washington v. Confederated Tribes of the Colville Indian ReservationSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Moe v. Confederated Salish & Kootenai Tribes of the Flathead ReservationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Nevada v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Hambrick v. Healthcare Partners Medical Group, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2015
- Kizer v. Tristar Risk Mgmt., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- People ex rel. Becerra v. Rose, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- People ex rel. Becerra v. Huber, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Hambrick v. Healthcare Partners Medical GroupCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.