Legal Opinion

Commercial Nat. Bank v. Smith

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided January 2, 1922No. 24298PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from First Judicial District Court, Parish of Caddo; E. P. Mills, Judge. Action by the Commercial National Bank against B. B. Smith and others. Prom a judgment maintaining an exception of no cause of áction and dismissing the suit, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Statement of the Case.

MONROE, C. J.

Plaintiff has appealed from a judgment maintaining an exception of no cause of action and dismissing this suit.

The petition alleges:

That R. B. Smith and Nelson L. Barnes, nonresidents, but temporarily within the jurisdiction, are indebted to it in the sum of $20,000, “represented by six notes, signed by the Tex-La-Homa Oil Corporation, less a credit of $273.65, of date February 13, 1920; all of said notes being dated at Tulsa, Okl., due 90 days after their date and payable at the Union National Bank of Tulsa, Old., with 8 per cent, per annum interest…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Yazoo & Mississippi Valley Railroad v. MontegudoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1896
  2. Butler v. StewartSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1866
  3. White Hall Agr. Co. v. Police JurySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1911
  4. Jacobs v. FrèreSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1876
  5. Petitpain v. FreySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1840

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Reeves v. Globe Indemnity Co. of New YorkSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1936
  2. Searcy v. NovoLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1939
  3. Self v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1933
  4. Kunnes v. KogosSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1929
  5. Albergo v. GigliottiUtah Supreme Court · 1938

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API