Legal Opinion

Nottingham-Spirk Design Associates, Inc. v. Halo Innovations, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided June 21, 2022No. 1:21-cv-00341Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION NOTTINGHAM-SPIRK DESIGN ) Case No. 1:21-cv-00341 ASSOCIATES, INC., ) ) Judge J. Philip Calabrese Plaintiff, ) ) Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker v. ) ) HALO INNOVATIONS, INC., et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ) AMENDED OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff Nottingham-Spirk Design Associates, Inc. worked with Defendant Halo Innovations, Inc. to develop a sleep product for infants and children. That collaboration resulted in a successful product that generated royalties for Nottingham-Spirk. In 2020, those royalty payments dropped off,…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Saeid B. Amini v. Oberlin CollegeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
  4. Taft Broadcasting Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
  5. Joe D'Ambrosio v. Carmen MarinoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API