Legal Opinion

Noyes v. County of King

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 3, 1898No. 2713PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, King County.—Hon. "William Hickman Moore, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Reavis, J.

Plaintiffs (appellants) seek to set aside and enjoin the collection of a portion of tax for the year 1895 standing on the assessment roll of King county. The tax *418was levied upon property of plaintiffs described as fractional lots three and six of block “ A ” of A. A. Denny’s Addition to the city of Seattle. Upon the city plat is found the description “ Lots three and six of Block ‘A’ of A. A. Denny’s Addition to Seattle.” These lots as platted originally had a frontage of sixty feet on the west side of Front street and a depth of one hundred…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Olympia Water Works v. Thurston CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Olympia Water Works v. GelbachWashington Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Thorne v. JoyWashington Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Best v. WohlfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Templeton v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Slayton v. FeltWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Fidelity Trust Co. v. PalmerWashington Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Lamar v. AndersonWashington Supreme Court · 1912

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API