Slayton v. Felt
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Morris, J., entered December 24, 1904, in favor of the defendant, after a trial before the court without a jury, dismissing on the merits an action to recover a broker’s commission.
1Opinion of the CourtCrow, J.
This action was commenced by appellant, Charles J. Slayton, against respondent, D. W. Kelt, to recover a broker’s commission on the sale of real estate in the city of Seattle. Upon the trial before the court without a jury, appellant presented findings of fact in his favor, which the court declined to make. Judgment was entered dismissing the action. Said judgment contained the fol*2lowing recital: “The court, having heard the testimony and the arguments of counsel, and being fully advised, finds the issues in favor of the defendant, and- that said action should be dismissed.” jSTo findings of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Parker v. JefferyOregon Supreme Court · 1894
- Bard v. KleebWashington Supreme Court · 1890
- Sadler v. NieszWashington Supreme Court · 1892
- Potwin v. BlasherWashington Supreme Court · 1894
- Kilroy v. MitchellWashington Supreme Court · 1891
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Bowman v. WebsterWashington Supreme Court · 1953
- Security Corp. v. Lehman Associates, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1970
- Western Dry Goods Co. v. HamiltonWashington Supreme Court · 1915
- State ex rel. Cicoria v. CorgiatWashington Supreme Court · 1908
- In Re Estate of KalfusNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1963
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.