Legal Opinion

Olympia Water Works v. Thurston County

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 13, 1896No. 2107PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Thurston County.— Hon. T. M Reed, Jr., Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hoyt, C. J.

Certain property of the Olympia Water Company was listed for purposes of taxation, and a valuation placed thereon by the assessor. Thereafter the board of equalization of the county, after notice to the water company, increased such valuation. From this decision the water company took an appeal to the superior court of the county. Thereafter a motion to dismiss this appeal was made, -and denied by the court, and the first question here presented is founded upon the denial of this motion to dismiss.

It is claimed on the part of the county that…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Taylor v. SecorSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Lawry v. Board of CommissionersWashington Supreme Court · 1895
  3. McDonald v. City of EscanabaMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  4. People ex rel. Gerstkemper v. Lots in AshleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Gilpatrick v. Inhabitants of SacoSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1869

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Dunbar v. State Board of EqualizationWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Benton v. Seattle Electric Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1908
  3. In Re Sutter-Butte By-Pass Assessment No. 6California Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Lewis v. BishopWashington Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Olympia Water Works v. GelbachWashington Supreme Court · 1897

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API