Legal Opinion
Szalay v. Handcock
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided November 11, 1991No. 91-61PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Donald L. Corbin, Justice.
The question presented by this appeal is whether an Arkansas court has authority under the Arkansas long-arm statute, Ark. Code Ann. § 16-4-101 (1987), and the due process clause, U.S. Const, amend. 14, to exercise jurisdiction over a foreign insurance company in a suit by the insured to recover under the insurance policy’s uninsured motorist clause for damages arising out of an accident in Arkansas with an uninsured Arkansas motorist.
On May 9,1989, appellant George Szalay, then a resident of New Jersey, renewed his automobile insurance policy with appellee, Keystone…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Michael Wayne Dean v. Pascual Q. Olibas, Doing Business as Freedom Bail BondsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- Bahn v. Chicago Motor Club InsuranceCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1993
- Arkansas Professional Bail Bondsman Licensing Board v. OudinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
- Gibson v. City of TrumannSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
- Domtar, Inc. v. Niagara Fire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.