Legal Opinion
Suss v. Durable Knit Corp.
City of New York Municipal Court
Decided December 15, 1955PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSanford H. Cohen, J.
The plaintiff moves for an order to strike the answer of the defendant and for summary judgment, directing the entry of judgment in favor of the plaintiff against the defendant in the sum of $3,060.96.
The plaintiff is the assignee of the Nicetown Dye Works (hereinafter referred to as “ Nicetown ”), and the complaint alleges that the latter was and is a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Pennsylvania and engaged in the business of commission processing of yarns and textiles generally in that State. That its dye house is located in the city of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, where…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Tauza v. . Susquehanna Coal Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Penn Collieries Co. v. . McKeeverNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
- International Fuel & Iron Corp. v. Donner Steel Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1926
- International Text Book Co. v. . ToneNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
- People Ex Rel. Armstrong Cork Co. v. . BarkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- William L. Bonnell Co. v. KatzNew York Supreme Court · 1960
- Berkshire Engineering Corp. v. Scott-Paine, New York County Courts1961
- Textile Banking Co. v. Colonial Chemical CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1967
- Alexander Land Corp. v. Rochester Reducing Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1961
- Marturano v. American Progressive Health InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1958
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.