Legal Opinion
William L. Bonnell Co. v. Katz
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 26, 1960PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHarold Baer, J.
The suit here is on a series of notes and a written guarantee. The defendant has admitted his obligation under the notes and guarantee but raises the affirmative defense that plaintiff is prohibited by section 218 of the General Corporation Law from maintaining this action. The plaintiff, a foreign corporation incorporated in the State of Georgia, admittedly has failed to obtain a certificate of authority pursuant to section 210 of the General Corporation Law.
Section 218 of the General Corporation Law provides as follows : “ A foreign corporation, other than a moneyed corporation, doing…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Tauza v. . Susquehanna Coal Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Dahnke-Walker Milling Co. v. BondurantSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- International Textbook Co. v. PiggSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Penn Collieries Co. v. . McKeeverNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
- Sterling Novelty Corp. v. Frank & Hirsch Distributing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1949
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Netherlands Shipmortgage Corporation, Ltd. v. Mark Madias and Nicholas T.K. SkarvelisCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Librairie Hachette, S. A. v. Paris Book Center, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1970
- Stafford-Higgins Industries, Inc. v. Gaytone Fabrics, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1969
- Dixie Dinettes, Inc. v. Schaller's Furniture Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1972
- Berkshire Engineering Corp. v. Scott-Paine, New York County Courts1961
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.