Legal Opinion

Marturano v. American Progressive Health Insurance

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 10, 1958PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHenry A. Hudson, J.

The defendant herein moves for an order pursuant to rule 113 of the Buies of Civil Practice dismissing the plaintiff’s complaint and directing that summary-judgment be granted in favor of the defendant. The action arises from the refusal of the defendant to pay disability insurance under the terms of a policy issued to the plaintiff September 5, 1952, designated as policy number 210502, in and by which policy plaintiff was insured against loss of time and earnings, hospital, medical and nursing services on account of sickness, illness or disease during the life of the policy.

The plaintiff has…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Curry v. MacKenzieNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
  2. Kiernan v. Dutchess County Mutual InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  3. Gerka v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1929
  4. Anderson v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
  5. Pribyl v. Van Loan & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Haeger v. SloteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API