Hirsch v. Rand
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the District Court of the Fifteenth District, City and County of San Francisco. The case is stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtTemple, J.
This is an action brought to recover damages for false imprisonment. When the case was called for trial, the plaintiff made a statement of the facts upon which he relied to recover; the substance of which, so far as it affects the question involved upon this appeal, is as follows: The
defendant was United States Marshal of the District at the time of the alleged trespass. That the plaintiff was arrested by the defendant’s deputy, as a deserter from the army of the United States. That the plaintiff immediately informed the deputy who arrested him, ■ that he was a stranger in the country, and…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Whitney v. ButterfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
- Poinsett v. TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1856
3Cited by7 opinions
- Fong v. SternesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Foley v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Van Vorce v. ThomasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- Clement v. DunnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Peterson v. CruickshankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.