Legal Opinion
Eaton v. Harsha
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided May 4, 2007No. 06-4030-JARPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER AND OPINION
JULIE A. ROBINSON, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment. Plaintiffs Kenneth Eaton and George Campbell, officers of the Topeka Police Department (“TPD”), bring this action under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1988 and the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution against their employer, the City of Topeka, and Steve Harsha, the Chief of Police for the City of Topeka, alleging that defendants violated plaintiffs’ right to free speech. The Court now considers motions for summary judgment…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Johnson v. City of MurrayDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2012
- Thomas v. Town of SalisburyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2017
- Painter v. Midwest Health, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2021