Legal Opinion

Johnson v. City of Murray

District Court, D. Utah

Decided November 9, 2012No. Case No. 2:10-CV-1130 TSPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

TED STEWART, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on Defendants Murray City (the “City”) and Peter Fondaco’s Motion for Summary Judgment. For the reasons set forth below, the Court will grant Defendants’ Motion.

I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND

The following facts are either uncontroverted or, where controverted, are construed in the light most favorable to the nonmovant Plaintiff. Immaterial facts and factual averments not properly supported by the record are omitted.

A. PLAINTIFF’S HIRING

Plaintiff began work for the…

2Cases cited70 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Albright v. OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Zisumbo v. Ogden Regional Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
  2. Tomlinson v. NCR CorporationUtah Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Unit Drilling Co.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2013
  4. Henrie v. Carbon School DistrictDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2022
  5. Jensen v. Nucor CorporationDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2023

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API