Legal Opinion

Cardinal v. Zonneveld

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided September 27, 1973No. 6984PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*404OPINION

By the Court,

Thompson, C. J.:

This appeal from a judgment entered upon a jury verdict for the defendant in a personal injury action presents two questions for our consideration. The first question concerns the reception of certain deposition testimony, and the second, the exclusion of proffered opinion testimony. It is the appellant’s contention that each ruling constituted reversible error.

The plaintiff-appellant, Ralph Cardinal, sustained serious personal injuries in an automobile collision. The automobile in which he was riding was driven by his wife, Grace, and collided with an…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Elsa W. De Wagenknecht v. Mrs. Hugo StinnesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1957
  2. Levine v. RemolifNevada Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Doyle v. JorgensenNevada Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Lockart v. MacLeanNevada Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Choat v. McDormanNevada Supreme Court · 1970

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cheyenne Construction, Inc. v. HozzNevada Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Gordon v. HurtadoNevada Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Sunrise Hospital v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of NevadaNevada Supreme Court · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API