United States v. A Lot of Precious Stones & Jewelry
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Michigan.
1Opinion of the Court
RICHARDS, Circuit Judge.
This was an information filed on behalf of the United States to forfeit a lot of precious stones and jewelry, and $1,020 in money, which had been seized by an in*62spector, and was in the custody of the collector of customs at Detroit. The proceeding was instituted under section 3082 of the Revised Statutes [page 2014, U. S. Comp. St. 1901]. The information contained three charges: First, that this lot of precious stones and jewelry was fraudulently imported into the United States from Canada by Albert Schmidt and Sara A. Crawford, without invoicing the same or, paying…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Coffey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Stone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Dealy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- United States v. ZuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. LaBellaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1965
- United States v. GramerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951
- Mathis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953
- Sierra v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1916
- United States v. One 1953 Oldsmobile 98 4 Door SedanCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1955
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.