Legal Opinion

Phenix Milling Co. v. Anderson

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 5, 1898PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Voluntary Assignment.—Petition to recover the proceeds of property sold, etc. Trial in the County Court of Logan County; the Hon. Louis C. Schwerdteeger, Judge, presiding. Petition dismissed. Appeal by petitioner.

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Justice Glenn

delivered the opinion of the court.

It is conceded by the stipulation upon which this cause was tried, that Walter Fristoe, at the time he purchased the flour in controversy, did it in pursuance of a conspiracy entered into between him and one Chronister with the preconceived intention of not paying for it, and also with the intent to have it seized and sold under a fraudulent execution, in favor of Chronister and against him, and that the appellant had no knowledge or notice of the fraud intended, to be practiced on it, or of Fristoe’s insolvency, until after the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hanchett v. WaterburyIllinois Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Freydendall v. BaldwinIllinois Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Joseph Davis, Cory & Co. v. Chicago Dock Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Chronister v. AndersonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1898

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Illinois State Bar Ass'n Mutual Insurance v. Coregis InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
  2. Illinois State Bar Ass'n Mutual Insurance Co. v. Coregis Insurance Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API