Freydendall v. Baldwin
Illinois Supreme Court
Appeal from the Appellate Court for the Second District;— heard in that court on appeal from the City Court of Aurora; the Hon. C. D. Smith, Judge, presiding.
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Scott
The bill in this case was brought by a number of the judgment creditors of William Lawrence & Co., and the object was to set aside as fraudulent a voluntary assignment made by that firm, under the provisions of the statute, to William F. Dickinson, on the 25th day of January, 1879. Incidentally to the principal relief, it was sought to set aside a judgment in favor of the Second National Bank of Aurora, also one in favor of Bebecca M. Baldwin, one in favor of Nellie E. Higgins, and one in favor of Susan S. Jenks, because such judgments were alleged to be fraudulent as to complainants. It is…
2Cited by33 opinions
- Preston v. SpauldingIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
- Joseph Davis, Cory & Co. v. Chicago Dock Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1889
- Paddock v. StoutIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
- Clark v. BurkeIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
- Connell v. GalligherNebraska Supreme Court · 1893
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.