Legal Opinion
Mary Rose Arellano v. Copart Incorporated
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided June 10, 2026No. 2:26-cv-00770Unknown
1Opinion
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Mary Rose Arellano, No. CV-26-00770-PHX-SMB 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 Copart Incorporated, 13 Defendant. 14 15 Before the Court are Plaintiff’s Application for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis 16 (Doc. 14); Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand (Doc. 15); and Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss 17 (Doc. 21). The Court grants Plaintiff’s Application, denies Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand, 18 and grants Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss for the reasons below. 19 I. BACKGROUND 20 Plaintiff appears pro se. Her Complaint alleges…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.