Legal Opinion

Pierce v. Standow

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 2, 1958No. Civ. 18019PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDooling, J.

Defendant Laila Standow appeals from the judgment against her based upon the collision of an automobile of which she was a coowner with, a parked automobile while her automobile was being driven by her 17-year-old son Tommy. The case was tried without a jury and the judgment against appellant is based upon the findings of the court that at the time of the accident the automobile-was being driven by her minor son with her implied consent and permission and that she had knowledge that he was an incompetent driver and had no license to drive.

The sole ground urged on appeal is that the evidence…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. See v. North American Accident InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Scott v. BurkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Hamilton v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Gray v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Bohn v. WatsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Elkinton v. California State Automobile Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  2. Pritchett v. Kimberling Cove, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
  3. Stafford v. Far-Go Van Lines, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1972
  4. Adams v. YoungCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  5. Allied Group Insurance v. GarciaIdaho Supreme Court · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API