Legal Opinion

Adams v. Young

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 18, 1967No. Civ. 29854PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFord, P. J.

This appeal presents the question as to whether the trial court’s determination that the defendant Belle Wiley Young holds in trust an undivided one-half interest in certain acreage in San Marino and must convey that interest to the executor and executrix of the estate of. May Wiley Adams, deceased, has substantial support in the record when viewed in the light of the applicable law. The action was brought by Wiley B. Adams, individually and as cóexecutor of the will of May Wiley Adams, deceased, his mother, against Belle Wiley Young, individually and as co-executrix of the will of May Wiley…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of CoverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Decou v. HowellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Hansen v. Bear Film Co.California Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Watenpaugh v. State Teacher's Retirement SystemCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Steinberger v. SteinbergerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Quezada v. HartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  2. Exclusive Florists, Inc. v. KahnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  3. Toney v. NolderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  4. California School Employees Ass'n v. King City Union Elementary School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
  5. California School Employees Ass'n v. King City Union Elementary School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API