Legal Opinion · Concurrence

People v. Potts

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 12, 1996No. 3-94-0781Published

1Concurrence

JUSTICE McCUSKEY,

specially concurring:

I concur because I recognize that Jennings, a decision of this court, is directly on point. Accordingly, I feel bound by stare decisis. However, I write separately because I believe Jennings was incorrectly decided and will result in unnecessary retrials.

It is very important to recognize that the defendant in this case freely, voluntarily and knowingly waived his right to a jury trial in open court. No one disputes the trial court’s finding on this issue. The only trial error claimed in this appeal is that the defendant did not additionally sign a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. People v. EnochIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Ross v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. People Ex Rel. Daley v. JoyceIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
  4. People v. MitchellIllinois Supreme Court · 1993
  5. People v. SandhamAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API