Feeley v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BENSON, J.
In this premises liability action, Nolan Feeley appeals from summary judgment against him. He contends that the statute of limitations applicable to his action should have been tolled while he was comatose as a result of injuries he received while on respondents’ premises. We agree, and reverse.
Facts and Procedural History
For purposes of this appeal and the motion below, the facts are undisputed. Appellant was an independent contractor employed by respondent Southern Pacific Transportation Company (Southern Pacific). While at his post on respondent’s premises, appellant was…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Weinstock v. EisslerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Pearl v. PearlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- Kyle v. Green Acres at Verona, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
- Hill v. Clark Equipment Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1972
- Hsu v. Mt. Zion HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- BASF Corp. v. SymingtonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- Alcott Rehabilitation Hospital v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Paniagua v. ORANGE COUNTY FIRE AUTHORITYCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Mancini v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharm., Inc. (In Re Mirapex Prods. Liab. Litig.)Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2019
- Hernandez-Robaina v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1993
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.