Legal Opinion

Jackson v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided January 15, 1958No. 389-55; No. 261-57PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMaddeN, Judge

In each of these two suits Milton C. Jackson sues in a different representative capacity. The asserted causes of action in the two suits are identical, each being based upon the same transactions between Southern Trading Company and the United States Maritime Commission and its successor agency, the United States Maritime Administration. The plaintiff could not, of course, recover in both suits. We find it unnecessary to consider the differences between the two suits, since we have concluded that the statute of limitations is a bar to the cause of action upon which both suits are based.

The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rosenman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Sword Line, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
  3. A. H. Bull Steamship Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1952
  4. Southeastern Oil Florida, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1953

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Nautilus Shipping Corporation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1958
  2. American President Lines, Ltd. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1958
  3. Gulf Oil Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1958
  4. Central Gulf Steamship Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API