Legal Opinion

Ridgell v. Farmers' Nat. Bank of Rockwall

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 16, 1925No. 3093PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLSON, O. J.

(after stating the facts as above). Appellant specially excepted to appellee’s petition on the ground that there was a nonjoinder of necessary parties, to wit, makers of notes sued upon, and complains here because the tidal court overruled his exception. It appears from the exception that it was on the theory that the allegation in the petition that appellee held liens against property belonging to makers of the notes nullified the allegation therein that said makers were “actually and notoriously ' insolvent.” Article 1848, Vernon’s Statutes. But, evidently, such was not the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hooks v. BridgewaterTexas Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Adams v. HughesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911
  3. San Antonio Light Publishing Co. v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1907
  4. Gurley v. Hanrick's HeirsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911
  5. McDonald v. WhaleyTexas Commission of Appeals · 1922

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Humphrees v. Boxley Bros.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1926
  2. Sivalls Motor Co. v. ChastainCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  3. Frey v. PearsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1943
  4. Williams v. MilligerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1961
  5. Robertson v. MeltonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API