State v. Sonny Charles Rome
Idaho Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
GUTIERREZ, Judge.
Sonny Charles Rome appeals from his judgment of conviction for aiding and abetting a burglary. Specifically, Rome argues the district court erred in denying his motion to dismiss the charge because Idaho’s burglary statute violates the Constitution. Rome additionally contends the district court erred in denying his motion for acquittal because the persistent violator enhancement statute does not apply to him. For the reasons explained below, we affirm the judgment of conviction.
I
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
The State charged Rome with burglary after he agreed to aid and…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- United States v. AlvarezSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- State v. ZichkoIdaho Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. BurnightIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
- Evans v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- State v. EscobarIdaho Court of Appeals · 2000
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Rome v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2018
- State v. Jane Doe (Juvenile)Idaho Supreme Court · 2019