Primus v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KIRSCH, Chief Judge.
Lawrence Primus brings this interlocutory appeal of the trial court's denial of his motion to suppress, raising the following issue for review: whether the trial court erred in determining that the drug evidence was admissible because it was the result of a consensual search where his roommate, who was at a different location, gave consent for the search but he did not.
We affirm.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On March 24, 2003, Detective Brady Ball of the Indianapolis Police Department was called to the seene of a traffic stop of a vehicle that contained cocaine. The…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Illinois v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Overstreet v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2003
- Krise v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. BulingtonIndiana Supreme Court · 2004
- Perry v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Timmie Bradley v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2016
- Tate v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
- Nowling v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
- Starks v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
- Kristapher D. Canfield v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2019
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.