Legal Opinion

Tate v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 12, 2005No. 49A05-0502-CR-81PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RILEY, Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Appellant-Defendant, Marcel Tate (Tate), appeals his conviction for unlawful possession of a firearm by a serious violent felon, a Class B felony, Ind.Code § 85-47-4-5; and his adjudication as an habitual offender, 1.C. § 35-20-28.

We affirm.

ISSUES

Tate raises three issues on appeal, which we restate as the following four issues:(1) Whether the warrantless entry and search of the motel room where Tate was present violated his rights under the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution and Art. I, Section 11 of the Indiana Constitution;(2) Whether…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Litchfield v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Kubsch v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Halsema v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Maul v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Cox v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. John Paul Garcia v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2015
  2. Figures v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. Truax v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. Hand v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. State v. KellerIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API