Legal Opinion
Timmie Bradley v. State of Indiana
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided July 7, 2016No. 49S05-1602-CR-83PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
On Petition to Transfer from the Indiana Court of Appeals, "No. 49A05-1404-CR-Í81
DAVID, Justice.
This case involves whether Bryant Beatty had apparent authority to consent to police entry into Defendant, Timmie Bradley’s, home. Specifically, does a house-guest, who happens to answer the door to a home shortly after he knocked to gain entry himself; have the apparent authority to consent to police entry? Under the facts and circumstances of this case, we hold that he does not.
• Bradley also challenges the protective sweep of his home that occurred after police entered. However, we need not…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Minnesota v. DickersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kevin M. Clark v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2013
- Douglas A. Guilmette v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2014
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- M.T v. v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2016
- Daniel Ray Holloway v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2017
- Kristapher D. Canfield v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2019
- Sebastian Durstock v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2018
- Jarvis Peele v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2019
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.