Legal Opinion

Cockrell v. United States

District Court, S.D. California

Decided April 19, 1999No. 97 CV 0281-B AJB, 97 CV 0350-B AJBPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND DECISION

BREWSTER, Senior District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

The separate affirmative defense of special employer immunity of the United States Government (“Government”) was bifurcated for separate trial. After a bench trial, and upon review of the trial testimony and exhibits, and of both Plaintiffs’ and Defendant’s post-trial briefs, the Court decides that the Government was not, at all times material, the special employer of Plaintiffs’ Decedents, Gary Cock-rell and Lisa Netsch.

II. STATEMENT OF THE CASE

This wrongful death action was brought by Plaintiffs Peggy Cockrell, the Estate…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Pacific Portland Cement Co. v. Food MacHinery & Chemical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
  2. Laeng v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Kowalski v. Shell Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Industrial Indemnity Exchange v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Hernandez v. Badger Construction Equipment Co.California Court of Appeal · 1994

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Caso v. Nimrod Productions, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API