Legal Opinion

Caso v. Nimrod Productions, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 14, 2008No. B198347PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PERLUSS, P. J.

— Christopher Caso and his wife, Anna Marie Caso, appeal from the judgment entered in their personal injury action after the trial court granted summary judgment in favor of Peter O’Fallon, Merritt Yohnka and Randy Hall, as well as their respective loan-out corporations Ryan Productions, Inc. (RPI), Merritt Yohnka, Inc. (MYI), and Nimrod Productions, Inc. (NPI). The trial court ruled the Casos’ claims were barred by workers’ compensation exclusivity. We affirm.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

1. The Accident and the Lawsuit

Christopher Caso, a professional stuntman,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Guz v. Bechtel National, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Cole v. Fair Oaks Fire Protection DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  3. S. G. Borello & Sons, Inc. v. Department of Industrial RelationsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Intel Corp. v. HamidiCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Kowalski v. Shell Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1979

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. LeFiell Manufacturing Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Angelotti v. Walt Disney Co.California Court of Appeal · 2011
  3. Ybarra v. John Bean Technologies Corp.District Court, E.D. California · 2012
  4. BMC West Corp. v. Town Center Courtyard CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2020
  5. Solis v. Clean Harbors, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2021

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API