Pehl v. Durst
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCrownhart, J.
It devolved upon the appellants herein to establish their case by. a preponderance of the evidence. If they did this, even though the evidence was that of experts, such evidence could not be disregarded by the court unless it was in some way impeached. It seems that the testimony of appellants’ expert witnesses was not impeached in any manner. Instead of its being contradicted, as to the children it was in substance agreed to by the only expert produced by the defendant who' had any experience with monoxide gas poisoning and who was qualified to testify. He testified to facts which would…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Baxter v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
- United States Heater Co. v. JenssWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
- Ladwig v. Jefferson Ice Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1910
3Cited by9 opinions
- Plainse v. EngleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
- Brust v. First National BankWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924
- Delap v. LiebensonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
- Johnson v. AgerbeckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
- Tovey v. GeiserSupreme Court of Kansas · 1939
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.