Legal Opinion

In re Domestic Air Transportation Antitrust Litigation

District Court, N.D. Georgia

Decided February 7, 1992No. Master File No. 1:90-CV-2485-MHS; MDL No. 861PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHOOB, Senior District Judge.

Pretrial Order No. 7

Presently before the Court are several motions to compel filed by plaintiffs against each of the four airline defendants in this action. Several discovery requests are objected to by most or all defendants. Plaintiffs’ motions to compel against all defendants with regard to these requests, therefore, will be dealt with concurrently. Other miscellaneous objections by each defendant to various discovery requests will be discussed individually. For the reasons stated briefly below, the Court will grant in part and deny in part plaintiffs’ motions…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. St. Regis Paper Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. International Brotherhood Of Electrical Workers Local Union No. 5 v. United States Dept. Of Housing And Urban DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
  3. In re Air Passenger Computer Reservation Systems Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1986

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. In re Nasdaq Market-Makers Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
  2. In re Domestic Air Transportation Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1993
  3. Camden v. State of MarylandDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1996
  4. Valassis v. SamelsonDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1992
  5. Brown v. St. Joseph CountyDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1993

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API