Legal Opinion

Mills-Jennings of Ohio, Inc. v. Liquor Control Commission

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 27, 1984No. 84AP-197, -199, -200, -201 and -203PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCormac, P.J.

These cases are consolidated for appeal from the Court of Common Pleas of Franklin County and present the common issue of whether the Liquor Control Commission (hereinafter “commission”) possesses the authority to seize and destroy gambling devices found on permit premises.

The case of Mills-Jennings of Ohio, Inc. v. Liquor Control Comm, (hereinafter “Mills-Jennings”) originated when plaintiff, an owner of draw poker machines and not a permit holder, sought a declaratory judgment in the court of common pleas that these machines were not gambling devices and were not subject to removal from…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. LilliockOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  2. State v. SammonsOhio Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Mills-Jennings of Ohio, Inc. v. Department of Liquor ControlOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Burger Brewing Co. v. ThomasOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  5. State v. DanielsOhio Supreme Court · 1980

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Loyal Order of Moose Lodge No. 1473 v. Liquor Control CommissionOhio Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. United Auto Workers, Local Union 1112 v. PhilomenaOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. BPOE Lodge 0170 Gallipolis v. Liquor Control CommissionOhio Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Republic Steel Corp. v. HaileyOhio Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. American Legion Post 0046 Bellevue v. Ohio Liquor Control CommissionOhio Court of Appeals · 1996

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API