State v. Sammons
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHolmes, J.
Appellant attacks the constitutionality of R. C 2919.22(A) asserting that it is void for vagueness and overbreadth under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. However, the argument propounded by appellant ignores the question of overbreadth. The sole issue before this court, therefore, is whether the statute is sufficiently definite to satisfv the requirements of due process of law.
R.' C. 2919.-22 provides, in pertinent part, that:
“ (A) No person, being the parent * * * of a child under eighteen * * * shall create a substantial risk to the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- United States v. HarrissSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Papachristou v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Smith v. GoguenSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States Civil Service Commission v. National Ass'n of Letter CarriersSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- State v. MileyOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
- Canton v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. KamelOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. ElliottOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
- Keser v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1985
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.