Legal Opinion
United Auto Workers, Local Union 1112 v. Philomena
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided March 10, 1998No. Nos. 97APE01-69 and 97APE01-100PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Per curiam
The appeal and cross-appeal presently before this court brings to our consideration the constitutionality of legislation included in Ohio’s Campaign Finance Reform Act, Am.Sub.S.B. No. 8 (“S.B. 8”), and presents significant free speech and association issues.
Enactment of S.B. 8 in 1995 brought about major changes in Ohio’s campaign finance law. Notable in the present appeal are certain provisions affecting public employees and labor organizations. As to public employees, S.B. 8 prohibits them from making voluntary political contributions by way of payroll deduction, and it prohibits a public…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Pickering v. Board of Ed. of Township High School Dist. 205, Will Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Elrod v. BurnsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Procter Gamble Company v. StonehamOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
- Sanger v. DennisColorado Court of Appeals · 2006
- State v. CooperOhio Court of Appeals · 2003
- International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local Union. 8 v. GromnickiOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
- State v. CephusOhio Court of Appeals · 2005
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.