Hurst v. Union Pacific Railroad
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN P. MOORE, Circuit Judge.
This appeal unlooses a legal dinosaur, which, once out, tramples twentieth century negligence law and then lumbers back to its dark cave only to await another victim. The jurisprudential fossils it leaves behind are truly daunting as this case illustrates. However, absent any contra-indication from the Oklahoma Supreme Court, the dinosaur prevails.
At issue in this diversity action is Oklahoma’s “occupied crossing rule” which governs the relationship between individuals traveling upon public roads that cross railroad tracks and railroads whose moving or stationary…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. GoodmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Pokora v. Wabash Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Ricardo Trevino v. Union Pacific Railroad Company and Missouri Pacific Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- Missouri Pacific Railroad v. CooperTexas Supreme Court · 1978
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hurst v. Union Pacific Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- Webster v. CSX TransportationDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999