Legal Opinion
Hurst v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided March 10, 1992No. 91-6091PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
958 F.2d 1002
Wanda G. HURST and William E. Hurst, Individually and as
Administrator of the Estate of Roy Everett Hurst,
a minor, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY and L.B. Cox, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 91-6091.
United States Court of Appeals,
Tenth Circuit.
March 10, 1992.
Terry W. West (Bradley C. West with him on the briefs) of Terry W. West, Inc. & Associate, Shawnee, Okl., for plaintiffs-appellants.
Tom L. Armstrong (Jeannie C. Henry and David S. Landers with him on the briefs), of Tom L. Armstrong & Associates, Tulsa, Okl., for defendants-appellees.
Before JOHN P. MOORE and…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. GoodmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Pokora v. Wabash Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Ricardo Trevino v. Union Pacific Railroad Company and Missouri Pacific Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- Missouri Pacific Railroad v. CooperTexas Supreme Court · 1978
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Krentz v. Consolidated Rail Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. Deloitte & ToucheDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1992
- Malcome v. Toledo, Peoria & Western Railway Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2004