Legal Opinion

Turbyfill v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 8, 1993No. CR 92-1263PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jack Holt, Jr., Justice.

This is a petition for writ of

prohibition filed on behalf of Mark Turbyfill, a defendant charged with felony theft of property, seeking to prevent his trial from taking place. We' grant the writ.

With the filing of the charge against Turbyfill, the one year time period for a speedy trial began on July 22, 1991. Ark. R. Crim. P. 28.2(a). The state then had twelve months to bring Turbyfill to trial assuming there were no excludable periods under Ark. R. Crim. P. 28.3, or by July 21,1992. Ark. R. Crim. P. 28.1. Turbyfill argues that the resetting of the trial from its…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. McConaughy v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
  2. Hicks v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
  3. Cox v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
  4. Novak v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
  5. Glover v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Ibsen v. PleggeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  2. Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  3. Moody v. Arkansas County Circuit CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  4. Gamble v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  5. Kelch v. ErwinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API