Legal Opinion

Glover v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 21, 1991No. CR 91-176PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Robert H. Dudley, Justice.

The petitioner seeks a Writ of Prohibition for violation of the speedy trial rules. The rules have been violated and, accordingly, we grant the writ.

Petitioner was charged with the crime of rape on June 12, 1990. He was free on bond with the condition that he report weekly to a probation officer. Two and one-half months later, on August 31, 1990, counsel was appointed, and, on October 4, his trial was set for January 29, 1991. His attorney learned that his secretary was related to the victim and so he filed a motion to withdraw because of a conflict of interest. The…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Chandler v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
  3. Gooden v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  4. Novak v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
  5. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Ibsen v. PleggeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  2. Clements v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  3. Matthews v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  4. Gamble v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  5. White v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API