Legal Opinion

Carolina Mortgage Co. v. Long

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 10, 1934PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConnor, J.

The plaintiff is a corporation, organized under the laws of this State, with its principal place of business in the city of Raleigh, Wake County. The defendants are citizens of this State, and are residents of Forsyth County. The action was begun and is now pending in the Superior Court of Wake County, which is the proper venue for its trial (C. S., 469, Smith-Douglass Co. v. Honeycutt, 204 N. C., 219, 167 S. E., 810), unless, as contended by the defendants, the action is for the foreclosure of a mortgage on land in Forsyth County. In that case, the proper venue for its trial is Forsyth…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Baber v. HanieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  2. Baber v. . HanieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  3. Councill v. . BaileySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
  4. Connor v. Dillard.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1901
  5. Jones v. Atlantic & Western RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Casstevens v. Wilkes Telephone Membership Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  2. White v. . RankinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  3. Penland v. Red Hill Methodist ChurchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  4. Hill v. Atlantic Greyhound Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  5. Lamb v. StaplesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API