Hill v. Atlantic Greyhound Corp.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBaRNHill, J.
The case on appeal in this cause was settled by the trial judge. While he did not in his judgment find the facts in detail, he certifies that the motion was heard and decided “upon the theory that the defendant corporation was domesticated in the State of North Carolina, and that the records of the office of the Secretary of State would disclose that it was duly authorized to transact business in the State of North Carolina, and that its main place of business was in the City of Winston-Salem, N. C.” The clerk so found, and the record sustains the finding. We are bound by the record as it…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. . DeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- Potts v. Life Insurance Co. of VirginiaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
- Simons v. . LebrunSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
- General Finance & Thrift Corp. v. GuthrieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
- Smith v. . BonneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Crain and Denbo, Inc. v. Harris & Harris Const. Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
- Ionic Lodge 72 F. & A. A. M. v. Ionic Lodge Free Ancient & Accepted Masons 72 Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- Noland Company v. Laxton Construction CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- Moore Golf, Inc. v. Shambley Wrecking Contractors, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
- Travelers Indemnity Co. v. MarshburnCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988