Legal Opinion

Skeens v. Miller

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided July 27, 1993No. 61, September Term, 1992Published

1Opinion of the Court

331 Md. 331 (1993)

628 A.2d 185

EDWARD JOHN SKEENS

v.

HELEN MARTHA MILLER.

No. 61, September Term, 1992.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

July 27, 1993.

Edward John Skeens, Suitland, on brief, for petitioner.

Raymond M. Hertz, Greenbelt, on brief, for respondent.

Argued before MURPHY, C.J., and ELDRIDGE, RODOWSKY, McAULIFFE, CHASANOW, KARWACKI and ROBERT M. BELL, JJ.

KARWACKI, Judge.

We issued a writ of certiorari in this case to determine at what time an attorney, who is retained on a contingent fee agreement and who is discharged without cause by the client prior to the occurrence of the contingency, may…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Fracasse v. BrentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Martin v. . CampNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  3. Rosenberg v. LevinSupreme Court of Florida · 1982
  4. Matter of TillmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
  5. In Re Estate of CallahanIllinois Supreme Court · 1991

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API