Legal Opinion
In re the Welfare of R.H.
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided September 4, 2013No. Nos. 43580-2-II; 43590-0-II; 43594-2-II; 43684-1-II; 43690-6-II; 43694-9-IIPublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtQuinn-Brintnall, J.
¶1 In this case, we address how RCW 13.36.040, the guardianship statute the legislature enacted in 2010, influences parental termination actions under RCW 13.34.180(1). The juvenile court entered orders terminating Bobby Adolphus’s parental rights to his three sons, R.H., T.A., and R.A. Adolphus appeals the termination orders, arguing that the juvenile court erred by denying his timely motion for a continuance to allow him to present evidence of the availability of a relative guardianship *422placement and that the State failed to prove several of the statutory elements required for termination…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- State Ex Rel. Carroll v. JunkerWashington Supreme Court · 1971
- Burrell v. Department of Social & Health ServicesWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- In Re Dependency of KSCWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- Gladin v. Department of Social & Health ServicesWashington Supreme Court · 2013
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Department of Social & Health Services v. T.P.Washington Supreme Court · 2015
- In re the Welfare of L.R.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- In re the Welfare of H.Q.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- Department of Social & Health Services v. L.H.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2016
- Franks v. State (In re M.-A.F.-S.)Court of Appeals of Washington · 2018
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.