Legal Opinion

Chapman v. Ticehurst

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 8, 1941No. 34,807PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Thiele, J.:

This was an action to recover the purchase price of personal property sold by plaintiff to defendant. The cause was tried by a jury, which found in favor of plaintiff and answered special questions submitted. The trial court rendered judgment in favor of plaintiff and defendant appeals, specifying errors which *311are presented under five general headings in his brief. Our statement of pleadings and of matters occurring at the trial is limited to those necessary to discuss the contentions presented.

A brief review of the pleadings discloses that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Montague v. BurgerhoffSupreme Court of Kansas · 1940
  2. Witt ex rel. Witt v. RoperSupreme Court of Kansas · 1939
  3. Faeth Co. v. BressieSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928
  4. Caple v. DrewSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Colin v. Decoursey Cream Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API