Chapman v. Ticehurst
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Thiele, J.:
This was an action to recover the purchase price of personal property sold by plaintiff to defendant. The cause was tried by a jury, which found in favor of plaintiff and answered special questions submitted. The trial court rendered judgment in favor of plaintiff and defendant appeals, specifying errors which *311are presented under five general headings in his brief. Our statement of pleadings and of matters occurring at the trial is limited to those necessary to discuss the contentions presented.
A brief review of the pleadings discloses that…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Montague v. BurgerhoffSupreme Court of Kansas · 1940
- Witt ex rel. Witt v. RoperSupreme Court of Kansas · 1939
- Faeth Co. v. BressieSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928
- Caple v. DrewSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
3Cited by1 opinion
- Colin v. Decoursey Cream Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1947